The United States Beat Australia Without Pulisic — and Pochettino’s Fix Showed How Much They Still Need Him

Take Christian Pulisic out of a side built around him and you learn what the structure underneath actually is. The United States lost their most influential player to a calf problem and still controlled Australia from the first whistle, kept the ball for nearly two-thirds of the match and walked into the knockout rounds with a clean sheet. On the scoreboard it reads like a favourite confirming its status. Look at how the two goals were made, and a more interesting question opens up: what does this team do when control has to become a goal?

The setup told you where Mauricio Pochettino’s mind was. With Pulisic unavailable, he did not try to replace a creator with a creator. He added a second striker. Ricardo Pepi started alongside Folarin Balogun, and the United States went after Australia high up the pitch, two forwards leading a press that gave the Socceroos no clean route out of their own half. It was a coach trading invention for pressure. If you cannot pick the lock, lean on the door until something gives.

For long stretches it worked exactly as designed. Australia are an organised, limited side who came to defend their box and counter into the space a committed opponent leaves behind. Pochettino refused to leave that space. Tyler Adams sat in front of the back four and swept up the few balls that broke; Weston McKennie and Malik Tillman pushed up to support the two strikers rather than build slowly from deep. The United States pinned Australia in, won the ball back high, and turned the contest into a siege. Sixty-three per cent of the ball is not an accident against a team happy to give it to you. It was the plan, and the plan held.

Recommended ReadingUnited States – Paraguay: a 4-1 that flatters the half the U.S. surrendered without Pulisic

Then look at the goals. The first arrived inside the opening quarter of an hour, and it came from pressure rather than from a passing pattern. Balogun stretched the play to the left and slid a low cross across the six-yard box; Cameron Burgess, stretching to cut it out before Pepi could reach it, turned it into his own net. The second, just before the interval, was a deflection: Sergiño Dest struck from the edge of the area, the ball spun off an Australian leg, and Alex Freeman read the new flight quickest to finish. Two goals, both of them the product of the United States forcing Australia into their own box and waiting for a mistake — and neither of them a move the Americans could draw on a whiteboard and reproduce on demand.

This is the distinction that matters, and it is not a complaint. Forcing errors is a skill; a side that presses well and crosses with intent earns the deflections and the own goals it gets, and the United States earned these. But there is a difference between a team that suffocates an opponent until the opponent breaks and a team that knows, against a deep block, exactly how it is going to score. The first is a method for beating sides that come to defend and crack. The second is what separates a genuine contender from a strong host. On the evidence of this match, Pochettino has built the first and is still searching for the second.

The reason is the man who was not on the pitch. Pulisic is the United States’ answer to a packed defence — the player who receives between the lines, commits a defender and bends the shape of a back line by carrying at it. Take him out and the team does not stop functioning; it stops having a designed solution to the specific problem a favourite is asked to solve over and over in a tournament, which is breaking down opponents who will not come out. The two-striker press is a fine response to that absence. It is also a response that depends on the opponent obliging. Australia obliged. A side that presses back, or that keeps the ball with any conviction, would not hand the United States the territory that made this performance possible — and then the question of who unlocks the low block returns, and it has only ever had one good answer.

None of which should be mistaken for a bad night. There was real substance here beyond the manner of the goals. The clean sheet was the most encouraging part of it: Adams in front of the defence, Chris Richards and the captain Tim Ream behind him, Antonee Robinson and Freeman tucking in — the United States gave Australia almost nothing in transition, which is precisely where this team has historically been punished. Balogun led the line with the kind of running that makes a press function even when it does not produce the ball he wants. Pepi justified the selection by occupying defenders and giving the high block a second focal point. This was a controlled, mature, professional win, and after the four-goal opening night against Paraguay it has carried the United States into the last sixteen with a game to spare. Six points and a goal difference of plus five is the work of a serious team.

But “serious” and “favourite” are not the same word, and a home World Cup is precisely where the gap between them gets exposed. The knockout rounds will not send Australia. They will send a side that keeps the ball, or one that defends deep and dares the United States to find a way through without leaning on a mistake. Pochettino now has the better problem to solve — he is through, he can rest legs, he can wait on Pulisic’s calf — but the tactical homework is unmistakable. The press and the second striker won him territory; territory won him two gifts; the gifts won him the game. Stack that sequence against a better opponent and the weak link is obvious. The United States need a way to turn control into goals that does not require the other team to make the first error.

There is time, and there is a route back to the easier version of this team. If Pulisic’s calf settles, the second striker can give way, the creator returns between the lines, and the question answers itself the way it always has. That is the quiet verdict of an otherwise comfortable evening: the United States proved they can dominate a tournament match without their best player, and in the same ninety minutes proved how much the hard part of being a favourite still runs through him. They are through. Whether they are contenders is a different examination, and Australia were never going to be the ones to set it.

More Like This

World Cup 2026, Group D: USA favoured, but Güler’s Turkey won’t agree

America has spent a decade calling this its best soccer team ever — a home World Cup is where the promise comes due

Mexico Beat South Korea to Win Group A — but the Favourites Still Haven’t Shown They Can Score

Australia – Türkiye: the 2-0 that turned Türkiye’s possession into a trap

The World Cup’s First Round Belonged to the Teams That Were Supposed to Lose

Argentina Beat Algeria and Looked Like Champions — but Their World Cup Now Rests Entirely on Messi