Soccer

The Netherlands keep losing World Cups beautifully — this one is built around a defender instead

The home of attacking idealism has finally stopped trying to be beautiful.
Jack T. Taylor

Listen to how Ronald Koeman talks about his own team, and you hear something a Dutch manager is not supposed to say. We are competing to win, he says, and then almost in the same breath he tells you the truth most coaches bury: that he knows the reality, that beating the big nations is still a long way off, that nothing is impossible but very little is owed. There is no swagger in it. For a man leading the Netherlands to a World Cup, that restraint is close to heresy — because the Oranje have spent half a century selling exactly the dream Koeman won’t.

That is the strange, quietly radical shape of this Dutch side. The country that handed football its most beautiful idea, the one that taught the rest of the world how the game could look when eleven players move as one thought, has arrived at a tournament built around its centre-back. Not a playmaker. Not a dream. A defender, and a manager who used to be one, and a spine designed to be hard to break rather than dazzling to watch.

The most beautiful way to lose

To understand how far that is from type, you have to remember what the Netherlands have always been. They are the best team never to win a World Cup, and they earned the title the hard way — three finals, three defeats, each one a different kind of heartbreak. They lost to West Germany in 1974 playing the most admired football the tournament had ever seen, a side so far ahead of its time that the world remembers the losers and forgets who lifted the cup. They lost again in 1978, in Argentina, in extra time, on the road. And they lost in 2010 to Spain, that time by abandoning their own beauty for something uglier and getting punished for both the cynicism and the defeat.

Total Football was the gift and the wound. It made the Netherlands the most influential footballing nation never to be champions, and it built an expectation into the orange shirt that every generation since has had to carry: be brilliant, be brave, be beautiful — and lose. The romance was the point, and the romance was the problem.

Built from the back

Koeman knows that history in his own legs. He was one of the great Dutch defenders, a centre-back who scored and conducted and won the things this national team never could, and the team he has assembled looks like a man building in his own image. The strength of it is at the back. Virgil van Dijk, the best defender of his generation, captains a defence stocked with Premier League hardness — Micky van de Ven’s recovery speed, Jurrien Timber back from the injuries that nearly cost him his place, the young Jorrel Hato, Denzel Dumfries flying forward from the right. This is not a back line that asks to be admired. It asks to be difficult.

In front of it sits a double pivot that does the same unglamorous work: Frenkie de Jong, the most gifted footballer in the squad, paired with Ryan Gravenberch, who covers the ground de Jong would rather not. De Jong receives and turns and threads; Gravenberch runs and presses and protects. The Netherlands rode that engine through qualifying without losing a match, drawing only twice with Poland and beating everyone else. They have, for once, made themselves boring to play against — and they mean it as a compliment.

The hole where the dream used to be

Except that a team built from the back still has to score, and this is where the new pragmatism starts to feel less like a choice and more like a necessity. The Netherlands were supposed to bring a genuine creator to this World Cup. Xavi Simons was meant to be the one, the No. 10 around whom the invention would flow — and in the spring his knee gave way, an anterior cruciate ligament ruptured in a Premier League match, and his tournament ended before it began. You cannot replace a player like that. You can only redistribute the burden.

So the creation now falls to Tijjani Reijnders, a fine midfielder asked to become something more, to manufacture in the final third the kind of moment that used to be a Dutch birthright. Cody Gakpo carries the most reliable threat from the left, cutting inside onto his right foot; Dumfries and Gakpo’s combination down the channel is the team’s most dangerous repeatable trick. And out beyond them stands Memphis Depay, the country’s all-time leading scorer, at a Brazilian club now and at his fourth World Cup, returning from a thigh problem for one last run at the only prize that ever eluded him. It is, on paper, enough. It is also thinner than the Netherlands are used to admitting.

The path, and the thing at the end of it

The draw was manageable, which is its own kind of test. The Netherlands open against Japan, the quickest and most coherent side in the group, a team that presses in waves and will not be intimidated by the orange shirt. Then Sweden, physical and direct and dangerous from set pieces. Then Tunisia, organised and stubborn, the kind of team that has knocked the swagger out of better sides than this one. A squad of this quality should come through. The Dutch, of all people, know what should is worth at a World Cup.

They will be measured later, in the matches where the opponent stops retreating and starts contesting, where a team that defends beautifully and creates carefully either finds the one player who can unlock a closed door or discovers it does not have him. That is the bet Koeman has placed — that you can win this tournament by being solid and honest and hard to beat, that the trophy the romantics never lifted might finally go to a Dutch team that gave the romance up. It would be the strangest of victories: the Netherlands becoming champions in the one summer they stopped trying to be the Netherlands.

Discussion

There are 0 comments.