Soccer

World Cup 2026: Germany and the Netherlands Are Out — Proof That Holding the Ball No Longer Keeps Favourites Safe

Kenji Nakamura

Two of the tournament’s control sides walked into the same room and could not find the door out. Germany kept the ball and shaped the game against Paraguay; the Netherlands set out to manage Morocco. Both spent the night doing roughly what they intended to do, and both finished it watching the other team celebrate at the end of a penalty shootout. The scorelines differ in their details. The pattern does not. At this World Cup, holding the ball is buying territory, and territory is not the same thing as safety.

That distinction is doing more to decide knockout ties here than any single piece of brilliance. A possession side wants the ball because the ball is supposed to be control: keep it, move it, and eventually the opponent’s shape cracks and a chance arrives. The logic holds when there is space to attack into. It stops holding when the opponent refuses to give you any. Compact blocks — eight or nine players inside their own half, lines close together, the central lane shut — turn possession into a long, patient siege with no breach. The favourite recycles the ball, looks busy, dominates the map, and creates almost nothing of consequence. The game stays level. And a level game, in this format, is a coin the underdog is happy to flip.

Germany are the cleanest illustration. They held Paraguay for long stretches, controlled the territory, had a goal disallowed in extra time, and could not turn an evening of the ball into the one moment that ends a tie. Paraguay defended their box with conviction, accepted that they would see little of the ball, and trusted that a side this organised could drag the contest to twelve yards. It did. Germany then missed three penalties. There is a temptation to file that under nerve or misfortune, and the shootout always carries some of both. But the shootout was only reachable because the structure in front of it had done its job for 120 minutes: deny the space, survive the siege, take your chances at a level score. The control side did everything it set out to do and lost anyway, because none of what it set out to do addressed the way the game was actually going to be decided.

The Netherlands offer the more revealing version, because they read the problem and tried to solve it — in the wrong direction. Against Morocco they shifted to a back five and set out to manage the game rather than dominate it, and in doing so they handed the initiative to a side that was only ever going to take it. Morocco held the ball, took more shots, and looked the more coherent team for long stretches. Cody Gakpo’s goal gave the Dutch a lead their performance had not really earned, and Issa Diop erased it in the first minute of stoppage time. By the shootout the pattern was set: Yassine Bounou saved from Crysencio Summerville, Ismael Saibari scored the winner, and the Netherlands went home before the Round of 16 for the first time in their history. A control side that abandoned control still ended up in the same place as the control side that kept it. The destination, not the method, is the story.

What the two defeats share is the moment the game tips out of the favourite’s hands. Possession football is built to win the phase before the decisive one — to dominate the ninety minutes so completely that the decisive moments never have to be contested. When the block holds and the ninety minutes end level, that advantage does not carry into extra time, and it carries into a shootout not at all. A penalty shootout is the most structure-proof event in the sport: it strips away shape, tempo and territory and asks eleven men to do something a back five cannot defend. The teams that surrender the ball and survive to that point have, in effect, chosen the one stage on which their disadvantage disappears.

The expanded bracket sharpens all of this. A 48-team field adds a Round of 32 — an extra layer of single-elimination football before the tournament even reaches its old starting line. Every one of those ties is another chance for a compact side to drag a favourite into a level game, and the more of these ties you stage, the more often the coin lands badly for the team that was supposed to win. Variance is not noise here; it is the design. The format manufactures more of exactly the games in which possession is least protective.

Look at who advanced and the profile is consistent. Brazil are through, but they needed Gabriel Martinelli at the very end to escape a Japan side that defended in numbers and asked Brazil to find a way through a closed door for most of the night; the winner arrived in the 95th minute, and a few seconds the other way and Brazil are the cautionary tale instead of Germany. Canada beat South Africa by the only goal, a low-event game settled by a single moment rather than by sustained domination. The teams moving forward are not, for the most part, the teams that controlled their matches. They are the teams that accepted a tight, ugly contest and trusted the parts of the game that decide a tight, ugly contest: a goalkeeper, a set piece, the nerve to convert when the structure finally produces a chance.

None of this means possession is a flaw. Over a group stage, control wins games and banks points, and the best teams in the world will keep building from it because across a long sample it is the surest way to be good. The knockouts are a different test. They do not reward being good over ninety minutes as reliably as they reward owning the handful of moments that settle a level game — the cleared cross, the saved penalty, the one transition you take cleanly. A side whose entire identity is the first thing and whose answer to the second is “we’ll have so much of the ball it won’t come to that” is exposed the moment an opponent proves it will, in fact, come to that.

The favourites still in the tournament should take the warning literally rather than emotionally. The lesson of Germany and the Netherlands is not that they were not good enough; on the night, both were arguably the better side. It is that being the better side is a ninety-minute claim, and these ties are no longer being decided inside ninety minutes. The teams built to control the ball will keep meeting opponents built to make the ball irrelevant — and unless they sharpen the part of their game that wins a level contest, they will keep arriving at the same room, doing exactly what they planned, and looking for a door that the format has quietly bricked up.

Tags: , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.