Music

Richard Wagner and the music that outlives its maker’s worst convictions

Penelope H. Fritz

The building was designed to make the orchestra disappear. Richard Wagner positioned the pit below the stage and covered it with a hood, so that the music would seem to rise without a visible source — a sound without a body, or a god whose mechanism was kept out of sight. He called the effect the mystic abyss. He designed every element of the Bayreuther Festspielhaus himself: the sloped floor, the double proscenium, the wooden acoustic shell, the banishment of boxes and social hierarchies. The hall opened for one purpose: to make his music work the way he heard it in his head. Nobody before him had built a building to stage their own compositions. Very few since have had the audacity.

He was born in Leipzig in May 1813, the ninth child of a clerk who died six months later. His stepfather Ludwig Geyer was an actor, and the theater entered the house before music did. He heard Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony at fifteen and understood what ordered sound could do to the body before he understood why. Carl Maria von Weber’s Der Freischütz showed him what German myth could become when married to orchestral color. He began studying composition in earnest, wrote a symphony at nineteen, and was directing opera productions in provincial German cities by his early twenties — always overextended, always certain.

His first decade was managed disaster executed with absolute conviction. He married the actress Minna Planer in 1836 and fled creditors to Paris in 1839 — on a ship across the Baltic during a storm so violent it planted the seed for his first mature opera: the story of a Dutch sea captain condemned to sail forever, unredeemable unless a faithful woman chooses him. He spent two years in Paris, failed to break into the Opéra, and staved off hunger with journalism and musical arrangements. What he had when he left was The Flying Dutchman — the ghost story that sounds like nothing he had written before — and Rienzi, a French grand opera that no French theater wanted.

Dresden wanted Rienzi. The premiere in October 1842 was a success large enough to win him the position of Royal Saxon Court Conductor. He wrote Tannhäuser and Lohengrin in those years — the medieval knight operas that brought his orchestral language to its first maturity — while also attending revolutionary political meetings. When the May Uprising of 1849 failed, he fled to Switzerland with an arrest warrant behind him. The exile lasted twelve years.

The Swiss years were theoretical in both senses. Wagner wrote the essays that would define his mature aesthetic — the Gesamtkunstwerk, the total artwork that would dissolve the borders between music, poetry, drama, and visual design — and drafted the libretto for a cycle of four connected music dramas sourced from Norse myth and the Nibelungenlied. Tristan and Isolde, composed during an infatuation with his patron’s wife Mathilde Wesendonck, was music of such radical harmonic instability that it seemed to promise the dissolution of key itself. King Ludwig II of Bavaria ended the exile in 1864 by paying Wagner’s debts outright. Tristan and Isolde premiered in Munich in June 1865. The Mastersingers of Nuremberg — vast, comic, and ambivalent about whether artistic tradition is a gift or a prison — followed in June 1868.

Wagner moved to Bayreuth in 1872 to oversee the construction of the Festspielhaus. He had married Cosima — daughter of Franz Liszt, former wife of conductor Hans von Bülow, and the woman who would manage his legacy for thirty-five years after his death — in 1870. The theater opened in August 1876 with the premiere of the complete Ring of the Nibelung: fifteen hours of music spread across four evenings, tracing a ring of gold from the bottom of the Rhine to the collapse of the gods. Parsifal, his final opera — a work about spiritual redemption whose relationship to Christianity, Buddhism, and the composer’s own ideology scholars have debated for 140 years — premiered at Bayreuth in May 1882. He died of a heart attack in Venice the following February, aged sixty-nine.

The critical problem with Wagner does not separate from the music; it runs through the scholarship the way the leitmotifs run through the scores. He published Judaism in Music in 1850 under a pseudonym, reissued it under his own name in 1869, and in it accused Jewish musicians of producing culturally hollow, derivative art alien to the German spirit — naming Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer by implication. Characters in his libretti — Beckmesser in The Mastersingers, Mime in the Ring, Kundry in Parsifal — have been read by serious scholars as antisemitic caricatures, a reading that other serious scholars dispute. His daughter-in-law Winifred ran Bayreuth as a cultural institution of National Socialism through the 1930s and 1940s. His music played at rallies and at the gates of camps. He died fifty years before any of this; he cannot be held responsible for the specific uses his heirs made of his work. He can be held responsible for what he wrote, and what he wrote is not separable from the cultural infrastructure that Bayreuth became. The question of whether the music can be fully heard apart from this history is asked every time an orchestra enters.

The 2026 Bayreuth Festival marks its 150th anniversary with seven productions, including the first Bayreuth staging of Rienzi in the festival’s history and a new Ring of the Nibelung produced with AI as a generative visual force — the first time artificial intelligence has appeared on that stage. Christian Thielemann conducts the new Ring. Wagner’s music has been performed continuously since his death by both Jewish and non-Jewish artists. With a handful of contested exceptions, including a controversial 2001 concert by Daniel Barenboim in Jerusalem, it has not been publicly performed in Israel since 1938.

What the Festspielhaus’s acoustics accomplish — the disappearance of the source, the sound arriving as if from the architecture itself — describes what Wagner wanted from the experience he was designing. He wanted the audience to lose track of the mechanism. The legacy is the argument about what that mechanism was. In 2026, in a theater he built himself, his music is being staged again, this time with artificial intelligence as one of its dramaturges. He would have approved of the ambition. The rest is still being settled.

Tags: , , , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.