Movies

Gary Oldman at TIFF’s New Market: A ‘Visionary’ Who Earned the Word Behind the Camera

Camille Lefèvre

There is a word Toronto is fond of this season, and it travels badly: visionary. The festival’s newly minted industry market hands it out as a marquee, a sidebar, a promise. Attach it to Gary Oldman, though, and it stops being decoration. It becomes a question about where authorship actually lives in a career — in front of the lens, or behind it — and Oldman is one of the very few names on this lineup who can answer from both chairs.

The trade coverage has run the obvious story: a guest list. Big names lend their wattage to a market still proving it exists, and Oldman’s is among the brightest. What that framing misses is the thing an auteurist eye goes to first. Nearly everyone summoned to talk ‘vision’ in Toronto has authored by producing, packaging, or selling. Oldman authored by acting — and then, once, by directing. The distinction is the whole story.

Consider the shape of his filmography as a series of collaborations rather than a résumé. He was Coppola’s Dracula, all rot and courtly grief. He was Oliver Stone‘s coiled Lee Harvey Oswald. He gave Christopher Nolan the moral ballast the Batman films needed and, later, the wounded studio-era conscience of a Fincher picture. This is a particular kind of authorship, the chameleon’s: an actor who does not impose a signature so much as dissolve into another director’s grammar and quietly hold it together. You can read his whole body of work as a history of great filmmakers borrowing his spine.

And then there is the credit the guest-list stories keep leaving off. In 1997 Oldman wrote, directed and produced Nil by Mouth, a raw, unsparing portrait of a South London family that the British Film Institute later placed among the hundred best British films of the century. He has directed exactly one feature in a career spanning four decades. That scarcity is the point. It is not a hobbyist’s dabble but a single, fully owned act of filmmaking — the rarest and most literal meaning of the word Toronto is now printing on his badge.

The market’s programming sharpens the contrast almost too neatly. On the same slate that seats Oldman, a discussion will dissect Obsession, the horror film Curry Barker shot for a rounding error and rode from a midnight premiere to one of the year’s improbable box-office stories, with ‘Barbie’ producer Robbie Brenner among the other speakers. Two models of the visionary sit a few chairs apart: the overnight ascent, minted by a spike no one saw coming, and the slow accretion of a performer who earned the label across decades and spent it, deliberately, on one film of his own. Both belong at a market. Only one of them tells you what the word is supposed to mean.

Which is why it is worth remembering what actually brings Oldman to Toronto. He is here, first, for television — the new season of the Apple series in which he plays the flatulent, brilliant spymaster Jackson Lamb, the first lead role a screen has ever handed him, arriving decades after he could have demanded one. The market talk is the sidebar; the work is the reason. He remains, at heart, an actor at his post, still turning up to disappear into someone else.

TIFF’s market wants to sell the idea that vision is a thing you can convene, schedule and put on a panel. Oldman’s presence quietly argues the opposite: that it is a thing you spend once, carefully, and cannot buy back.

Tags: , , , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.