Soccer

Zidane Is France’s New Coach — and the Pick Is Tactics, Not Sentiment

Kenji Nakamura

France did not so much hire a coach as end a vigil. Zinedine Zidane is the new manager of the national team, and the temptation is to file it under fairytale — the greatest player the country ever produced, coming home to the bench. Read the decision more closely and the sentiment thins out. This is a choice about design, and it was long in the making.

The detail everyone repeats and nobody quite sits with is the refusal. Zidane did not drift toward Les Bleus between projects. He turned down club after club to keep one chair warm, saying the France team was the only thing he wanted to do. That is not romance. It is a wager — a manager staking the most bankable stretch of his coaching life on the bet that this specific job would come open, and that he would be the one handed it.

The wager reframes the appointment. A homecoming is passive; you arrive because a door opens. What Zidane did was closer to holding a position — declining the shelter of a club, where a bad season can be survived quietly, to wait for a post with no rehearsal and nowhere to hide. His first competitive bench in years is a World Cup contender he now has to remodel in his own image, live.

And the image is the point. Ask Zidane what moves him and he answers like the playmaker he was: the game, the goals, the ball going forward. For more than a decade France won another way. Didier Deschamps built a machine of control and caution, a side designed to concede little and decide late. It was ruthlessly effective and rarely loved at home, because winning by suppression never looked like the football France believes it is owed.

There is a symmetry the federation is plainly counting on. The last time France’s game looked unmistakably like itself — inventive, front-footed, settled by a playmaker’s imagination — Zidane was the playmaker. Handing him the design is a way of asking the team to remember what it once was, from the one man with the standing to insist on it.

That era did not end in control. It ended in a fourth-place finish and a 6-4 defeat by England in the third-place match, a scoreline that reads like a system overrun rather than a plan narrowly missed. Whatever else the loss settled, it closed the argument that pragmatism alone would keep carrying this generation. France did not turn to an attacking idealist on a whim; it did so once the control model had been pushed past what it could hold.

The credential that keeps the swing from looking naive is the one that made the wait defensible. Zidane’s Real Madrid was no possession seminar; it was three straight Champions Leagues built on trusting attackers and managing a dressing room heavier than any national side. He carries a No. 10’s instincts and a serial winner’s proof that they convert into trophies. The bet France is matching is that the instinct and the evidence arrive together.

The terms run four years, to the 2030 World Cup, with the job starting at the top of August. Federation president Philippe Diallo hands him a Nations League group first, not a gentle friendly — an away trip to face Türkiye to open, then Italy at the Stade de France, with Belgium also in wait. It is a schedule built to read Zidane’s France quickly, before the sentiment has cooled.

So the gamble now runs both ways. Zidane spent the safest years of his coaching life refusing every net beneath him; France spent them waiting for a man who has not yet had to lose in public. One of those bets is about to be tested first.

Tags: , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.