Music

Dave Marsh, Bruce Springsteen’s Great Believer, Dies at 76

The most influential Springsteen chronicler never pretended to be neutral — and that conviction is both his gift to rock criticism and the thing the field spent decades arguing with.
Alice Lange

Dave Marsh spent a career refusing the one pose most critics eventually learn to strike: the cool distance that says the writer is above the music, weighing it from a safe remove. Marsh never wanted the remove. He wrote about rock and roll the way a believer writes about a faith — as something worth defending, arguing over, and, when the moment demanded it, going to war for. Bruce Springsteen was the artist he defended most fiercely, but the deeper subject was always the same: that this music mattered enough to be taken seriously by serious people.

That conviction is why his death lands as more than the loss of a byline. Marsh helped invent the idea that the rock critic could be a partisan and still be indispensable — that advocacy, done with enough rigor and moral weight, was a form of criticism rather than a betrayal of it. He is the writer who built the Springsteen bookshelf, and he is also the writer a later generation defined itself against.

He came up inside the loudest room in American music writing. A Pontiac kid who dropped out of Wayne State to write for Creem, he learned the trade alongside Lester Bangs, then carried that combative energy into Rolling Stone, The Village Voice and Newsday. When he turned his full attention to Springsteen, the result was not a fan tribute but the first genuinely ambitious attempt to make the case in book length — the biography that argued a bar-band songwriter from New Jersey belonged in the American canon, and made the argument stick.

What the reverent obituaries tend to soften is how close that advocacy actually ran to its subject. Marsh married Barbara Carr, who became one of Springsteen’s co-managers; he was, by his own account, the man who introduced Jon Landau to Springsteen, setting in motion one of the most consequential partnerships in the business. The proximity that made his writing intimate also made it unmistakably partisan. Marsh knew it and never apologized for it, because to him the alternative — the critic who pretends to hover outside the thing he loves — was the real dishonesty.

You can draw a straight line from that stance to the fights that consumed music criticism after him. The whole “rockism” argument of the following decades — the charge that critics had turned a narrow canon of guitars-and-authenticity into a moral hierarchy — was in large part an argument with the model Marsh embodied. Peers who admired him still called him grumpy and combative; he wrote reviews that could take the skin off an artist he thought was coasting. The believer’s warmth and the enforcer’s edge were the same instrument.

And he was never only a Springsteen man. In The Heart of Rock & Soul he ranked the 1,001 greatest singles ever made and put Marvin Gaye’s “I Heard It Through the Grapevine” at number one, a list-maker’s monument to the soul, doo-wop and girl-group records he loved as much as any stadium anthem. Through the Rock & Rap Confidential newsletter and a lifetime of anti-censorship work, he insisted that writing about music was inseparable from writing about power — who gets heard, who gets silenced, who gets to decide what counts.

Marsh died Friday at his home in Connecticut, at 76, after living for several years with a degenerative brain disease; the news was confirmed by his friend Jeffrey St. Clair and by his SiriusXM colleagues, where he had remained a fixture on E Street Radio. He and Carr endured the kind of loss that reorders a life when her daughter Kristen Ann died of sarcoma at 21, and they built the Kristen Ann Carr Fund in her name. Springsteen and Steven Van Zandt were among the first to mark his passing.

The tributes will call him the great Springsteen biographer, and he was. But the harder thing to replace is the stance itself — the critic who thought neutrality was a cop-out and made you feel that caring this much about a three-minute song was the only serious response to it. The field spent years arguing with that idea. It is going to miss having someone worth arguing with.

Tags: , , , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.