Movies

My Dearest Assassin on Netflix: raised by an assassin family, never trained as one

Molly Se-kyung

Lan grew up inside a family of contract killers and was never taught to use a knife. House 89 — the assassin clan that took her in after her parents were murdered for what flowed in her veins — kept her as a protected asset rather than a person, because her blood, a rare type, was worth more to the world than her life. The first thing My Dearest Assassin asks is what happens to a woman whose body has always been a resource for someone else, and the answer it builds across two hours is darker and more interesting than the marketing has suggested.

The film is shaped like a Netflix action-romance and pitched, even by its own publicity, as a Thai counterpart to John Wick or as the next Mr. and Mrs. Smith for streaming audiences. Beneath that pitch it is something else. The romance with Pran, the heir of House 89, and the rivalry with M, the orphan raised alongside her, are the framework, not the subject. The trio is the same family read three ways — the heir born into the profession, the orphan trained as labor, the woman taken in and kept as asset — and every interaction between them is a question about which of those three positions has the most legitimate claim on what House 89 made of them. What the film is actually about is the moment when the woman who has been valued for what her body produces finally chooses to use that same body to fight back. Everything the film does mechanically, including the romance, is in service of that reversal.

YouTube video

The structural argument lives in the opening. The female-led action film, as a form, has a near-universal grammar: the woman is already deadly when the film begins. Atomic Blonde opens with Charlize Theron recovering from violence she has already done. Kill Boksoon opens mid-mission. Chocolate opens with the protagonist’s body already wired for combat. The audience meets the woman as she has already been made into the thing she is. My Dearest Assassin inverts this. Lan is introduced not as an assassin but as the absence of one. The first act spends time on what was done to her body before it shows what she does with it. The shape of the film is closer to a story about emerging from a particular kind of captivity than to a training-and-revenge arc. The architectural similarity is not to John Wick; it is to films about coming to recognize the conditions of one’s own keeping. The training, when it finally arrives, is filmed less as transformation than as recovery — slowly, late, against the wishes of the people who love her, the body learns to do what it was never permitted to do as a child.

The craft signature is what gives that argument its weight. Director Taweewat Wantha did not come from action. He made his name with Death Whisperer 1 and 2 and the cult horror title Art of the Devil, films where violence lands on flesh rather than dances through choreography. The reference points the marketing reaches for film violence as ballet — long takes, geometric blocking, gun-fu as visual rhythm, the body as instrument. Wantha’s horror lineage produces something different. Bodies hit the floor with weight. Blades work like they cut. The recipient of violence registers it; the camera stays close enough to feel it. That choice inverts the conventional action-romance grammar. It also, by extension, inverts how the romance reads. A horror director’s instinct is to keep stakes physical, and so Pran and Lan touch each other across a film in which touch is otherwise mostly violence. The romance becomes the rare instance of the body being allowed to mean something other than asset or weapon. The contrast — body-as-property versus body-as-presence — is craft, not theme.

The real-world anchor is the part of the film least visible in its trailers and most legible to its actual audience. Lan is coded Vietnamese in a Thai film, hunted across Southeast Asia for what runs in her veins. That is not incidental design. The rare-blood premise reads as the literal version of a regional and global discourse about female bodily commodification that has been running for the last five years — biometric data harvesting, organ traffic, reproductive surveillance, the trafficking and forced cosmetic surgery that recur in Southeast Asian crime news, the post-Roe debate in the United States about whose body is whose property. These are not adjacent concerns. They are the same question repeated in different registers. My Dearest Assassin takes the question and writes it as genre. The diasporic dimension matters: a woman whose body is wanted somewhere else, by people from somewhere else, taken in by a place that protected her partly out of love and partly because it understood what she was worth. Audiences across Southeast Asia will recognize the architecture of that particular bind. Being protected and being kept are sometimes the same gesture.

The Thai predecessor that matters here is not John Wick but Chocolate, Prachya Pinkaew’s 2008 film with Yanin Vismitananda, where another Thai woman’s body was structurally exceptional and the entire film was about what she did with that exception. My Dearest Assassin is in conversation with that lineage more than with the global comp Netflix is selling it on. The Thai version of the female-action form has consistently been less interested in revenge as catharsis than in the conditions that produced the dangerous woman in the first place. Chocolate asked what kind of love made the protagonist’s body ready for violence. This film asks what kind of love kept it from being ready, and what the cost of that protection was.

The systemic context is also worth naming. My Dearest Assassin is Netflix Thailand’s first action-romance original and the keystone of a 2026 slate the platform has positioned as its most ambitious in the country to date. More than ninety percent of Netflix members in Thailand watch local content; thirty-three Thai titles have charted in the streamer’s global top ten. The platform’s first wave in Thailand was prestige drama and commercial breakout work — Hunger, Master of the House, Mad Unicorn. This is the next phase: Thai genre cinema engineered for the global window, with theatrical-quality directors moved into streaming and pairings of A-list domestic stars (Baifern Pimchanok and Tor Thanapob, in their first on-screen work together) positioned as cultural events. The arc mirrors what the platform did with several Korean genre directors after Squid Game — take a domestic theatrical voice, scale it for the global window, use the result to build a category. Sunwrite Moonact is being positioned as a Thai genre studio with international travel. If the film carries, the platform learns that Thai pairing-events can export. If it does not, the platform learns where the limits of that strategy lie.

What the film cannot resolve, and does not try to, is whether any of this — the training, the kill of the antagonist, the choice to fight on her own terms — gives Lan back the years she spent being kept rather than raised. A body that has been protected as cargo by people who loved her cannot be returned to its owner by a final fight, however well-shot. The training does not retroactively make the years before she could choose her own. The romance, by structural definition, cannot give her back what was withheld in the name of her safety. The film does not insist on this. It simply ends on the question, the way Wantha’s horror films end on the question of what survival actually costs.

My Dearest Assassin - Netflix
My Dearest Assassin.Thanapob Leeratanakachorn (ธนภพ ลีรัตนขจร) as Pran (ปรานต์),Pimchanok Luevisadpaibul (พิมพ์ชนก ลือวิเศษไพบูลย์) as Lhan (ลัน) in My Dearest Assassin Cr. Yupanakorn Boonprem © 2026 Netflix

My Dearest Assassin (เลือดรักนักฆ่า) is directed by Taweewat Wantha, written and executive-produced by Wattana Weerayawattana, with Oraphan Arjsamat as executive producer, and produced by Sunwrite Moonact. The cast is led by Pimchanok “Baifern” Luevisadpaibul as Lan, Thanapob “Tor” Leeratanakachorn as Pran, and Sivakorn “Porsche” Adulsuttikul as M, with Toni Rakkaen as the antagonist Phurek and Chartayodom “Chai” Hiranyasthiti as Po.

The film runs 2 hours 7 minutes, is rated TV-MA for violence and language, and premieres globally on Netflix on May 7, 2026.

Discussion

There are 0 comments.