Movies

Kit Connor’s Cyclops is a director’s bet on the X-Men role cinema keeps failing

The X-Men reboot's pick reads less like a lookalike search than a Schreier theory of Scott Summers — the leader defined by restraint. The test is whether Marvel lets it breathe.
Camille Lefèvre

Every era of the X-Men on screen has stumbled over the same man. Not the feral one who sells the posters, but the one who is supposed to lead: Scott Summers, the boy whose power is a wound he has to keep aimed. Cyclops is the discipline the franchise has never had the patience to film, the character cinema keeps reducing to a jaw and a visor while the story runs off after Wolverine. So the news that Kit Connor is Marvel’s choice for the part matters less as a fan verdict than as a tell about how this reboot intends to read him.

Because the interesting thing is not whether Connor looks like Scott Summers. It is that the pick is legible as a director’s instinct rather than a corporate search for a chin. Jake Schreier, who is steering the reboot, is an actor’s filmmaker; his Thunderbolts assembled a young ensemble and asked it to carry interiority, damage worn on the inside, the opposite of the armor-plated blockbuster reflex. Cyclops is precisely a part about the inside — a man defined by the effort of holding himself closed. Connor’s work has lived there. The tenderness of Heartstopper, the fraying control of Warfare, the watchfulness he lent an animated bird: these are performances of restraint, of a self kept under pressure. That is a coherent theory of the character, and it is Schreier’s theory, arrived at, by the trade accounts, after months of meeting and testing before the choice was made.

Deadline broke the pick, and neither Marvel nor the actor’s representatives have put a name to it on the record — the usual choreography of a reveal that wants the noise without the commitment. What is visible is the shape of the ensemble forming around him, and it rhymes: Samara Weaving as Emma Frost, Sadie Sink circling Jean Grey, the mutants cast young enough to be lived in for a decade rather than introduced and retired. This is not the accident of an open slot. It is a plan to grow a company of actors, and to trust faces the audience has not yet fixed to these roles.

The skepticism worth having is not aimed at Connor. It is structural. The screen has had capable Cyclops before and squandered them — James Marsden, subordinated to the Wolverine plot and eventually written out, now recalled for the multiverse victory lap; Tye Sheridan, handed the visor in the younger-timeline films and given almost nothing behind it. The failure was never the casting. It was a machine that treats Scott Summers as a piece of connective tissue between set-pieces, a leader with no film willing to sit inside his leadership. The question this reboot actually poses is whether Marvel’s world-building apparatus, with its obligations to a larger timeline, will let a Schreier read of the character breathe — or grind it back into the same plot-function the part has always been.

There is a version of this that works, and it is not the loud one. It is the film that understands Cyclops as the argument at the center of the X-Men — the case that restraint is a form of power, that a man who has to aim his own eyes is the moral spine of a team built from people the world would rather fear. Connor can play that. The open question is whether he will be allowed to, or whether the visor will once again do the acting.

Marvel has not dated the picture, and the reveal is being rationed a name at a time. What has been decided is the harder thing: that the X-Men’s most thankless role now rests on a young actor picked for what he can hold in, by a director who seems to know that is the whole part. If they mean it, the visor stays shut and the man behind it finally gets a movie.

Tags: , , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.