Movies

Jason Alexander, on the Courtney Stodden sketch: “I offer her my sincerest apologies”

The Seinfeld actor owns a sketch he helped write. Courtney Stodden is using his apology to push a child-marriage ban.
Veronica Loop

When a sitcom star apologizes in writing, the reflex is to file it as closure. Jason Alexander’s statement about the comedy sketch he once made with Courtney Stodden does the opposite. It is short, and its restraint is precisely what keeps the story open.

Writing to Variety, the actor did not dodge the verdict on the sketch. He called it inappropriate and said he regretted it, then turned to the person on the other side of the joke:

“But more importantly, I am deeply sorry for any harm or distress it has caused Ms. Stodden. I offer her my sincerest apologies.”

Read it again and the caution surfaces. “Any harm or distress it has caused” keeps the damage conditional, a possibility rather than a fact, even as the sincerity reads as genuine. That is the grammar of a statement built to be read twice: once by the public, once by a lawyer. It grants regret while narrowing exposure.

The narrowing matters more here than it would elsewhere, because Alexander was not merely cast in the sketch. He was credited as a writer on it. “The Donny Clay Show,” a Dr. Phil parody released on Funny or Die, put him in the chair of a leering host who rubbed a phone across the chest of a girl who was seventeen, joking about what he would do once she turned eighteen. “Looking back,” the phrase that opens his apology, carries a heavy load for a man who helped write what he is now looking back on.

What lifts this above the standard celebrity mea culpa is that Stodden has refused to accept the apology as the finish line. Reposting the sketch, she noted she could not have legally consented to it: the contracts were signed by adults, and her paycheck went to the man she had married as a child. Then she moved the target. She is pressing Alexander, and everyone applauding him, to back a California bill that would set eighteen as the minimum age to marry with no exceptions, and steering attention to the nonprofit that works to end child marriage in the United States.

Her sharpest line is aimed past him entirely. “Getting an apology from an actor and not a doctor is kind of diabolical,” she said, a reference to the television physician who, she says, examined her body on air when she was sixteen and never apologized. In one sentence she reframes the transaction: an apology is the cheapest currency in the celebrity economy, and she is being offered it by the participant with the least institutional power, while the professionals who handled her as a minor stay silent.

The industry has become fluent in the apology as a genre: measured, released to a trade, absorbed by the news cycle within a day. Stodden’s answer is a reminder of what the genre cannot do. An apology closes the chapter for the person who gives it. Only a law closes it for the child who is next.

Tags: , , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.