Movies

Christopher Nolan, on the Odyssey backlash: “I spent 10 years of my life dealing with Batman”

Camille Lefèvre

Christopher Nolan has never been a director who argues with his audience before the lights go down. So when the loudest pre-release storm of his career gathered around The Odyssey — the American accents, the armor, the casting, the online certainty of people who had seen only a trailer — he did not defend the film. Speaking to The Telegraph, in remarks Variety carried, he reached instead for the one franchise that had already tried to break him.

“Remember, I spent 10 years of my life dealing with Batman,”

It sounds like a shrug. It is closer to a manifesto. The thought he attached to it — that on Begins he inherited a character more than half a century in the making, freighted with everyone’s idea of what he represents, and learned that “you can’t worry about any of that at all” — is not really about tolerance for abuse. It is about where a filmmaker’s loyalty is supposed to sit. For Nolan, the answer has never been the fanbase. It is the text.

That is the auteur’s oldest article of faith, and Nolan is one of the few who gets to practice it at blockbuster scale. He pulled Batman out of the neon camp of Batman & Robin and rebuilt him as tragedy, and he did it by honoring the source, in his phrase, by “interpreting it in the strongest way you personally can” — interpretation that refuses to poll the room. The same discipline runs through Dunkirk‘s withheld sentiment and Oppenheimer‘s moral vertigo. Each time, the noise that preceded the film — including the near-unanimous doubt over handing the Joker to a rom-com actor named Heath Ledger — turned out to know nothing about the film it was describing.

Which is precisely his point about The Odyssey. The complaints are real and specific: armor that echoes a certain cowl, modern English in Homer’s mouth, and a cast (Lupita Nyong‘o as Helen, Elliot Page as Sinon) that drew a pile-on amplified by Elon Musk, who announced that Nolan had “lost his integrity.” Nolan’s reply is not that the critics are wrong. It is that they are early. “These conversations that happen before people see the film,” he told The Telegraph, are “always irrelevant, because no one having them knows what the film actually is yet.”

The wager underneath the sentence is the one he has made his whole career: that a film, once seen, retires the argument about it. It is why the Batman line lands as earned rather than defensive. He did not win that decade in the discourse; he won it in the cut, with three pictures that outlasted every prior conversation about the cowl. Universal releases The Odyssey this month, with Matt Damon as Odysseus, Anne Hathaway as Penelope and Tom Holland as Telemachus, and the film now has to do what the tweets could not.

There is a risk in the stance, and Nolan surely knows it: “irrelevant” is an easy word from behind final cut, and a poem three thousand years old carries more freight than even the Dark Knight. But he has spent a decade proving the method with a man in a cape. Now, with Odysseus finally on screens, the only jury he has ever trusted is the one that has actually watched.

Tags: , , , , ,

Discussion

There are 0 comments.