Movies

Us — Jordan Peele’s doppelgänger horror, where the shadow self arrives at the front door

Martin Cid
Add us on Google

Jordan Peele‘s second feature arrived in March 2019 carrying the pressure of what a debut like Get Out creates: the need to prove that the first film was a statement of intent rather than a lucky convergence. Us met that pressure and, in most ways, exceeded it — a home-invasion horror that turns the family into a mirror rather than a victim, with a mythology large enough to sustain the film’s ambitions and fragile enough that the third act strains under their weight.

The film opens in 1986, at the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk. A young girl named Adelaide wanders away from her parents into a funhouse hall of mirrors and comes face to face with something that should not be there: herself, but not herself. What she encounters in that corridor is not reflection but confrontation, and the experience lodges in her so completely that she carries it, mute and unresolved, into adulthood.

Decades later, Adelaide Wilson — now played by Lupita Nyong‘o — returns to that same stretch of coast on a family vacation with her husband Gabe Wilson (Winston Duke) and their children, Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and Jason (Evan Alex). She is visibly uneasy from the moment they arrive, cataloguing omens that no one else registers as omens. What she senses, and cannot say aloud, is that she was there before in a way that left something behind — or left a mark on something below.

The inciting sequence is among the more unsettling setups in recent horror. At night, a family of four stands at the end of the Wilsons’ driveway: still, silent, dressed in red jumpsuits, holding golden scissors. When Gabe opens the door and shouts at them, nothing changes. The stillness is more disturbing than any movement would be. Peele holds on the image long enough to let it become genuinely unnerving before explaining it — and when the explanation arrives, it is worse than the mystery.

The strangers are the Tethered: doubles created underground to shadow every person above, living in sync — eating the same meals, performing the same gestures — without freedom or choice. They have spent decades in the dark while their counterparts lived in the sun, and they have come up with scissors and a decades-long grievance. Red, the Tethered version of Adelaide, speaks in a broken rasp, moves with a choreographed stillness that reads as threat, and announces that the family’s reckoning has arrived.

Written and directed by Peele, Us draws a line between the Tethered and the American underclass without ever making that line explicit enough to feel like instruction. These are people who lived underground, moving in rhythm with those above, discarded rather than destroyed by whatever mechanism produced them. The film uses as a recurring image the 1986 Hands Across America charity event — millions of Americans joining hands in a line across the country — and reassigns its meaning. The Tethered replicate the gesture not as solidarity but as a claim, a reckoning stretched across the California coast in red. The allegory stays open enough that the film functions as genre entertainment and as something more discomfiting at the same time.

The film’s real engine is Lupita Nyong’o, who carries both versions of Adelaide with entirely different bodies. As the frightened mother she is precise and restrained. As Red, the Tethered counterpart, she is something else entirely: a voice damaged into something between a whisper and a croak, a physicality that communicates menace through deliberateness and stillness rather than sudden movement. The distance between the two performances — the gap that separates them without letting you forget they inhabit the same face — is where the film is most alive. Nyong’o won the New York Film Critics Circle award for Best Actress for the dual role; it is one of the more demanding split performances in recent horror.

Winston Duke plays Gabe with a comic-dad energy that functions as relief valve without undercutting the dread — his attempt to reason with the Tethered family in the driveway, treating them like trespassers who might respond to negotiation, is both funny and exactly the wrong approach. Elisabeth Moss and Tim Heidecker play the Tylers, the Wilsons’ wealthier friends, through a trajectory darker and less survivable, and Moss makes the most of a character the script does not give much room. Shahadi Wright Joseph and Evan Alex play the Wilson children and their Tethered doubles with a controlled menace that makes the quieter exchanges between them as unnerving as the louder ones.

Michael Abels’ score deserves particular mention. He took the Luniz track ‘I Got 5 on It’ — a hip-hop classic from 1995 — and reconstructed it as a driving orchestral piece that runs under the film’s opening and recurs throughout. A familiar song made strange is a fair summary of what the whole film is attempting. The broader score runs against horror convention by weaving choral elements into the tension sequences, giving the film’s setpieces a ceremonial quality that suits its more ambitious register.

Mike Gioulakis’s cinematography keeps the boardwalk and the vacation house feeling genuinely menacing without reaching for the usual horror shorthand. Tight compositions hold characters inside environments that feel too small for them; carefully placed red sits at the edges of frames before it arrives at the centre. The underground sequences — showing the world the Tethered actually inhabit — are lit with a clinical flatness that renders the horror more administrative than atmospheric, which seems like a deliberate choice rather than a failure of imagination.

Where Us strains is in its third act. As the mythology of the Tethered is unpacked — the origin of the experiment, the logistics of life underground — the film trades atmosphere for architecture. Explaining the mechanics in detail deflates rather than deepens the horror; the more precisely the Tethered are accounted for, the less uncanny they become. The setpieces hold up in isolation; the exposition around them is less sure-footed, and the film argues with its own better instincts during the final thirty minutes.

The ending carries a revelation that retroactively reframes everything preceding it — the kind of twist that rewards a second viewing more than most, and that points toward why Nyong’o was given the particular assignment she was. Peele does not underline it; he lands it and steps back, letting the implications settle at whatever depth the viewer is prepared to go.

Us confirmed that Get Out was not an accident. It is a film that earns its scares, carries more on its back than its premise announces, and occasionally strains under the load. The third-act difficulties do not undo what came before. Two films into his career as a director, Peele had established a mode of horror so specific to his preoccupations — socially alert, formally precise, unafraid to be funny — that the form began to carry his name.

Tags: , , , ,

Add us on Google

Discussion

There is 1 comment.