Henri Matisse, the artist who made his most joyful work lying down

Henri Matisse

Photo: JackyM59 / Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Born	December 31, 1869 Le Cateau-Cambrésis, France
Died	November 3, 1954 (84)
Occupation	Painter
Awards	Grand Prize, Venice Biennale

At some point near the end of 1941, the man who had spent fifty years insisting that painting was a form of pleasure found himself unable to paint. Henri Matisse had undergone abdominal surgery — duodenal cancer, the kind of operation that takes months from which to return, if you return at all — and he emerged from it bedridden, diminished in ways he had not yet mapped, facing what looked like a closing. His doctors had told his family to prepare. Instead, Matisse picked up a pair of scissors.

What followed was not a coda. Jazz (1947), the series of Blue Nudes (1952), The Swimming Pool (1952), The Snail (1953) — these paper cut-outs, made by painting sheets of paper with gouache and then cutting shapes from them with scissors, represent one of the most radical pivots in the history of art. Matisse called the technique “drawing with scissors.” The works are not smaller than what preceded them; they are larger, more absolute, stripped of every uncertainty that the loaded brush introduces. A bedridden man in his eighties made paintings that feel like the air moving.

Henri Émile Benoît Matisse was born in Le Cateau-Cambrésis, in the textile region of northern France, on the last day of 1869. His father was a grain merchant with a sideline in hardware; there was nothing in the household to predict an artist. Matisse passed the bar examination and spent two years as a law clerk in Saint-Quentin, filing documents and waiting for something to happen. What happened was appendicitis. Recovering in bed in 1889, his mother brought him a box of color paints to pass the time. He later described the moment as a kind of annunciation: “When I started to paint I felt transported into a kind of paradise.” He was twenty years old. He never went back to the law.

He arrived in Paris in 1892 and enrolled at the École des Beaux-Arts under Gustave Moreau, the symbolist painter who was, in retrospect, the ideal teacher for Matisse: a man who encouraged his students to look at color not as description but as sensation. Moreau’s atelier also produced Georges Rouault, Charles Camoin, and Henri Manguin — a generation that would reconceive French painting. Matisse spent his apprenticeship at the Louvre, copying old masters — Chardin, Poussin, Raphael — in a manner that was less reverence than interrogation. He wanted to understand what held a picture together before he could understand how to loosen it.

The early paintings are technically accomplished and emotionally quiet. Woman Reading (La Liseuse, 1895) — one of his first works to enter a public collection — has the concentrated stillness of a Vermeer. Nothing in it announces revolution. But Matisse was accumulating materials. A stay with the painter John Peter Russell on the Île de Belle-Île introduced him to Impressionism directly. Contact with Paul Signac and a summer in Saint-Tropez in 1904 pushed him into Neo-Impressionism, the systematic division of color into dots. He found pointillism too rigid — too much system, not enough sensation — but the experience clarified what he was after: not color that described light, but color that was light.

The summer of 1905, spent in Collioure on the Catalan coast with the painter André Derain, was when everything broke open. Matisse came back to Paris with canvases that did not explain themselves by any existing standard. At the Salon d’Automne that autumn, his work and Derain’s and Vlaminck’s were grouped together in a gallery that the critic Louis Vauxcelles described as a cage of wild beasts — les fauves. The name stuck and became a movement, though it was really more of a temperature than a program: the belief that color should be used at its maximum intensity, not modulated toward photographic resemblance.

Woman with a Hat (La femme au chapeau, 1905) arrived at the Salon as a provocation. Matisse’s wife Amélie sat for it; the result rendered her face in strokes of orange, green, and purple that bore no relation to actual skin tone but produced a portrait of astonishing presence. The American collectors Leo and Gertrude Stein bought it. Portrait of Madame Matisse, also known as The Green Stripe (La Raie verte), placed a stroke of pure green down the center of Amélie’s face to divide the composition and create a tension between warm and cool that operates before the image is read as a face at all. These paintings were not expressionist in the sense of distortion — they were structurally logical, built on a different logic.

Le Bonheur de vivre (1905–6) — held today at the Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia — is the most complete statement of what Matisse was arguing. It is a large canvas of intertwined figures in an Arcadian landscape, rendered in flat planes of color that abandon depth, modeling, and shadow almost entirely. The reclining nudes, the ring of dancing figures at the back, the warm pink-orange sky: it reads as effortless, as if color had simply arranged itself. That ease is the argument. Art, Matisse believed, should feel like a comfortable armchair — not a challenge to be endured, but a condition to inhabit.

The Russian merchant Sergei Shchukin commissioned what would become Matisse’s most monumental work. La Danse (1909–10, State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg) and La Musique (1910, also Hermitage) were designed for the staircase of Shchukin’s Moscow mansion. The five red figures of La Danse, circling against a field of deep blue sky and green earth, use almost no modeling — they are silhouettes of a primal energy. The simplification is absolute and the effect is overwhelming. When Shchukin initially asked Matisse to cover the genitals on the figures before installation, Matisse refused; Shchukin withdrew the request.

Two trips to Morocco in 1912 and 1913 introduced the geometry of Islamic decorative tradition into Matisse’s work — the way patterns saturate a surface without any object demanding priority. The wartime paintings of 1915–17 shifted register entirely: The Piano Lesson (1916, MoMA) is flat, gray-green, almost monastic, the piano occupying the lower half of the canvas while the room opens into geometric zones of color above. The ease had gone. What replaced it was something cooler and more deliberately constructed — as if Matisse was testing whether the argument held under pressure. It held.

Then came the Nice period, and with it, the accusation.

From 1917, Matisse settled primarily on the Côte d’Azur, working in the warm light of Nice and Cimiez. The Odalisques of the 1920s — harem women draped on patterned fabrics in warm interiors — drew sharp criticism from intellectuals who felt he had retreated from the modernist project into bourgeois decoration. The surrealists were dismayed. Louis Aragon accused him of painting for the comfortable classes while Europe descended into fascism. There was something to this. And there was also something else.

While Matisse painted domestic interiors in Nice, his daughter Marguerite Matisse Duthuit was active in the French Resistance. She was arrested by the Gestapo in 1944, transported toward a concentration camp, and survived only because the prison train was rerouted by Allied bombing and she escaped in the chaos. Matisse learned of her ordeal after the liberation. The cheerful Odalisques and the patterned rooms sit in one part of history; Marguerite’s arrest sits in another part of the same history. Neither cancels the other, but any reading of the Nice period that ignores what was happening outside those windows is incomplete. Matisse himself never painted what was outside those windows. What that tells us about him remains open.

What is beyond dispute is that, in 1948, Matisse undertook his most ambitious single project — not a painting but an entire space. Sister Jacques-Marie, a Dominican nun who had nursed him after his surgery and had previously modeled for him as a young woman, asked him to design a chapel for her convent in Vence. The Chapelle du Rosaire de Vence (1948–51) is a complete synthesis of his ideas. The stained-glass windows flood the white interior with colored light; the murals — black line drawings on white ceramic tiles — depict the Stations of the Cross and a large Dominican figure in an economy of gesture that owes something to Matisse’s own paper cut-outs. He designed the altar, the vestments, the candlesticks. It was the architecture of a total environment, and it is the argument he had been building his whole life: that the right organization of color and form could change how a person feels, physiologically, in a room.

The surgery had not ended his working life — it had liberated it. By removing the standing easel, it pushed him into a medium that had no accumulated tradition to resist. Jazz (1947), a book of twenty paper cut-outs accompanied by Matisse’s handwritten reflections on art and memory, was the first major public statement of the new form. The shapes — a blue acrobat, a yellow trapeze, a red clown — had the quality of concentrated experience rather than description. They were not paintings that happened to be cut from paper; they were a new language using the logic of painting.

The Blue Nudes (1952) — four large cut-outs of female figures constructed from arcs of blue paper — eliminate every detail that does not contribute to the sense of a body organizing space. They are not nudes in the academic sense; they are propositions about how a body occupies the world. The Snail (1953), held at Tate Modern, is an arrangement of colored rectangles that refer to a shell’s spiral only as a principle of rotation — it is as far from representation as Matisse ever traveled, and it arrived in his eighty-third year.

He died in Nice on November 3, 1954. Pablo Picasso, who had remained his primary interlocutor for half a century — they collected each other’s work, competed with each other’s reputations, and publicly maintained a rivalry that was in practice a conversation — said afterward: “He always had the sun in his belly.” It was not entirely a compliment, but it was more accurate than it looked. The sun in Le Bonheur de vivre is the same sun that cuts through the windows of the Vence chapel, which is the same light that animated the paper cut-outs made by a man who could no longer stand. The argument Matisse was making — that joy is not decorative, that color is a force, that pleasure requires as much rigor as grief — never changed. What changed was the form in which he made it, and the circumstances under which he was required to make it.

The two Matisse museums — in Nice and in Le Cateau-Cambrésis — continue to hold major portions of his legacy. His paper cut-outs have entered the permanent collections of MoMA, Tate Modern, and the Centre Pompidou. The Barnes Foundation in Philadelphia owns Le Bonheur de vivre and the second, definitive version of The Dance (1932–33), a mural that covers three lunettes across an entire wall. Auction records for his work have continued to rise. The cut-outs, once the most radical objects he made, are now the most sought-after, which Matisse would have found characteristic: the works that looked like easiest pleasure required the most discipline. That has always been the case.

Tags: art, artists, Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, Fauvism, modern art

Featured News — Henri Matisse

Art

Bonhams Paris opens autumn with work the Soviet state spent decades trying to suppress

Art

Henri Matisse: Lines of Connection presents six decades of works on paper from the Pierre and Tana Matisse Foundation

Art

The Phillips Family Collection Will Highlight Christie’s Marquee Week | New York

Art

The Met to Present Works by Henri Matisse and André Derain from the Beginning of Fauvism

Art

Picasso’s Secret Portrait of Marie-Thérèse Walter To Be Offered at Sotheby’s This November, Est. in the region of $25 million

Art

Ugo Rondinone Presents Works Alongside 19th-Century American Artist Louis Eilshemius, Exploring Dialogue of Art, Nature, and Poetry | The Phillips Collection | Washington DC

See all →

Related People

Claude Monet

Charles Baudelaire

Pablo Picasso

Edgar Degas

Junji Ito

Wassily Kandinsky