Art

Alex Katz, the painter who outlasted abstraction by refusing to argue with it

Penelope H. Fritz
Add us on Google
Alex Katz
Photo: George Quasha / CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
BornJuly 24, 1927
Brooklyn, New York, United States
OccupationPainter
AwardsJohn Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship · American Academy and Institute of Arts and Letters · Lifetime Achievement Award, National Academy of Design · National Medal of Arts

The question Alex Katz never bothered to answer was the one American painting spent the 1950s and 1960s insisting was the only one worth asking: what does it mean to paint from the inside out? The Abstract Expressionists had an answer — gesture, scale, psychic necessity. Katz had a different project. He wanted to paint Ada’s face precisely as it appeared in afternoon light, and he was not particularly interested in theorizing about it.

What he was doing was harder to dismiss than it looked. The same year Jackson Pollock’s drip paintings were commanding the conversation, Katz was developing a style that flattened everything — form, shadow, hierarchy — into large fields of color interrupted by the specific contour of a face, a tree, a party dress. He grew up in Queens, the son of Jewish immigrants from Odessa. His father had owned a factory there before the Soviet revolution ended that chapter of the family’s history. Katz studied at Cooper Union in the late 1940s, then spent a formative summer at the Skowhegan School in Maine, encountering a landscape he would return to for the rest of his life. His first solo exhibition came in 1954 at the Roko Gallery. In the decade that followed, he destroyed roughly 1,000 canvases — not out of despair but out of precision. He was looking for something specific and he threw out everything that wasn’t it.

What he found was a mode of painting that owed as much to Japanese woodcuts and cinema as it did to the American tradition. The large-scale works he began producing in the early 1960s had the graphic certainty of posters. The Black Dress (1960) showed Ada six times in the same black cocktail dress, arranged like a film contact sheet. The Red Smile (1963), nearly ten feet wide, placed her profile against an expanse of red that functioned less as background than as atmosphere — the color of a room you couldn’t leave. Blue Umbrella I (1972) raised the ante further, reaching dimensions that put it closer to architecture than to picture-making. The most expensive Katz to go to auction, it crossed three million pounds sterling. None of this came from chasing the market. The market arrived slowly, across decades, and found a painter who had been making the same calculated moves the whole time.

The public ambitions were literal, too. In 1977, Katz installed a billboard in Times Square: 23 portrait heads spanning 247 feet, 20 feet high. Three years later he completed a mural for the U.S. Attorney’s Building at Foley Square. The work was scaling outward while its logic remained entirely interior — faces, places, light.

Ada Del Moro, whom Katz met at a gallery opening in 1957 and married on February 1, 1958, became the subject of more than 250 portraits across their marriage. She is one of the most painted women in American art history, yet the paintings resist psychological interpretation in a way that has made critics uneasy. They do not tell you what Ada is thinking. They tell you what the light was doing at the moment Katz looked. Whether that is a limitation or a principle has been the central debate about his work for 60 years.

That debate is worth examining directly. The flatness of affect in Katz’s portraits — the surface that gives up information about posture and color and the cut of a coat but withholds the interior drama that oil painting is historically supposed to reveal — reads to some critics as evasion. Robert Storr identified in the work “a new and distinctive type of realism in American art which combines aspects of both abstraction and representation,” which is one way to describe it. Another is that Katz found a way to make the viewer supply the psychology the painter withheld, and that this act of withholding is itself a form of control. The paintings do not confide. They present.

Since 2022 he has been working from iPhone photographs — the same analytical eye applied to a new source material. The Four Seasons series, shown at SCAI PIRAMIDE in Tokyo in the summer of 2025, translated snapshots of Maine into large-scale canvases with the same governing clarity he has applied to everything. A white lotus series followed, this time from Maine beach photographs. Late in 2025, new paintings at Gladstone Gallery in New York explored a single orange against white ground — Maine roads, reduced to their essential temperature.

He turned 99 on July 24, 2026. In the months around that birthday, his work appeared in Tübingen, London, Salzburg, and Seoul. The Colby College Museum of Art in Maine mounted a drawing survey. The National Medal of Arts, which he received at the White House in October 2024, noted his work for conjuring an enduring portrait of America. What Katz has actually conjured is more specific than that: an enduring portrait of what it costs to look carefully at ordinary things for 70 years and resist the pressure to explain what you find.

Tags: , , , , ,

Featured News — Alex Katz

See all →

Add us on Google

Discussion

There are 0 comments.