Series

Netflix’s Cashero and the Neoliberal Superhero: The Monetization of Virtue

This essay examines the Netflix series 'Cashero' through a critical lens, arguing that it represents the monetization of virtue in neoliberal society. The show's protagonist embodies the idealized values of individualism and self-reliance, while also promoting consumer culture and the accumulation of wealth.
Molly Se-kyung

In the vast, saturated landscape of global entertainment, the superhero genre has long functioned as a modern mythology, a space where the anxieties of the zeitgeist are sublimated into spectacular displays of power. If the American superhero tradition, dominated by figures like Superman or Iron Man, has historically grappled with the ethics of omnipotence and the responsibilities of the geopolitical hegemon, the emerging wave of South Korean superhero narratives is carving out a distinct niche rooted in the specific socio-economic pressures of the peninsula. We have seen the generational trauma of the Cold War materialized in Moving, and the metaphysical bureaucracy of the afterlife in The Uncanny Counter. Now, arriving on screens with a premise that is as audacious as it is socially incisive, Cashero strips the genre of its cosmic pretensions and grounds it in the most visceral of modern realities: liquidity.

The series, which has just become available for streaming, posits a universe where heroism is not a function of genetic destiny or technological genius, but of purchasing power. The protagonist, Kang Sang-woong, possesses a superhuman strength that scales in direct proportion to the physical cash he holds on his person. The cruel, transactional twist at the heart of the narrative is that the exercise of this power physically consumes the capital. To stop a bus from crashing, he must burn through his savings. To defeat a villain, he must liquidate his assets. In Cashero, the act of saving the world is indistinguishable from the act of going broke.

This central mechanic transforms the show from a standard action romp into a biting satire of late-stage capitalism. It literalizes the metaphor that “money is power,” but immediately subverts it by introducing the concept of scarcity. Unlike the billionaire vigilantes of Western canon, for whom wealth is a static, self-replenishing resource that enables technology without personal cost, Sang-woong’s power is finite, fleeting, and painfully earned. The viewer is invited to participate not just in the adrenaline of the fight, but in the anxiety of the balance sheet. Every punch thrown is a calculation; every heroic intervention is a deduction from a wedding fund or a housing deposit. In this light, Cashero operates as a profound commentary on the “pay-to-win” mechanics of contemporary existence, suggesting that in the current economic paradigm, even moral agency is a luxury good.

The Salaryman as Mythological Figure

The cultural figure of the “salaryman”—the white-collar worker who trades individuality for the stability of the corporate or state apparatus—has historically been depicted in Korean media as a figure of pathos or quiet endurance. Cashero weaponizes this mundanity, elevating the civil servant to the status of a mythological warrior while keeping his bourgeois anxieties intact. Kang Sang-woong is not a chosen one prophesied to bring balance to the force; he is a community center official who dreams of homeownership. His aspirations are domestic, not galactic. The intrusion of the supernatural into his life is framed not as a blessing, but as a financial catastrophe.

Lee Jun-ho, an actor who has steadily dismantled his idol origins to become one of the most nuanced performers of his generation, inhabits Sang-woong with a frantic, tactile desperation. His performance eschews the stoic minimalism often associated with the superhero archetype in favor of a high-strung, nervous energy. Sang-woong is a hero who is constantly patting his pockets, not to check for weapons, but to ensure his solvency. The physicality Lee brings to the role is grounded in the weight of the prop itself—the stacks of cash that disintegrate into ash as he fights. This visual effect, rendered with a gritty realism by the show’s visual effects team, serves as a potent memento mori for the value of labor. We watch as the hours of overtime, the skipped meals, and the frugal savings are incinerated in seconds of violence.

The narrative explicitly positions Sang-woong as a “dirt spoon” hero reliant on “gold spoon” resources he does not possess. This creates a compelling internal conflict: he is a member of the working class who requires the fuel of the capitalist class to protect his community. The irony is palpable. He cannot overthrow the system because he literally runs on it. The show asks a question that resonates deeply in a society grappling with the “Hell Joseon” discourse: Is it possible to be a hero without capital? And if one chooses to be a hero, is poverty the inevitable price?

Cashero
Cashero

The Pragmatics of Altruism: Kim Min-sook

If Sang-woong represents the reckless expenditure of emotional and financial capital, his partner Kim Min-sook, portrayed by Kim Hye-jun, represents the harsh discipline of economic reality. In a genre that frequently marginalizes the romantic interest as a damsel in distress or a moral compass, Min-sook functions as the operation’s Chief Financial Officer. A math whiz with a razor-sharp sense of efficiency, she is the voice of the viewer’s own economic anxiety. She does not ask “Is it right to save them?” but rather “Can we afford to save them?”

Kim Hye-jun’s performance is a masterclass in understated authority. She grounds the fantastical elements of the show in the domestic realism of a couple trying to plan a wedding in an inflationary economy. Her skepticism of Sang-woong’s newfound abilities is not born of fear, but of practicality. She recognizes his power for what it is: an inefficient asset. The dynamic between the two offers a realistic look at how economic stress impacts modern romance in South Korea, where marriage is increasingly viewed as a financial merger as much as a romantic union. The tension in their relationship is not generated by love triangles or misunderstandings, but by the depletion of their joint savings account. Min-sook’s struggle to protect Sang-woong’s wallet is, in effect, a struggle to protect their future.

The Bureaucracy of Vice: The Supporting Ensemble

The show expands its critique of modern coping mechanisms through its supporting cast, a motley coalition of heroes whose powers are triggered by consumption and vice. Kim Byung-chul, an actor known for his chameleonic ability to navigate between the terrifying and the absurd, plays Byun Ho-in, a lawyer whose supernatural abilities are activated by alcohol intoxication. This mechanic serves as a dark satire of the corporate hoesik (drinking gathering) culture, where professional capacity is often conflated with alcohol tolerance. Byun Ho-in must essentially poison himself to be effective, turning a social vice into a tactical necessity. As the self-appointed head of the “Korean Coalition of Superheroes,” he embodies the bureaucratic inertia that pervades even the world of the supernatural. He is a hero trapped in middle management, organizing a resistance against evil while likely drowning in paperwork and hangovers.

Complementing this is Bang Eun-mi, played by Kim Hyang-gi, whose telekinetic powers are fueled by caloric intake. In a society obsessed with body image and dieting, Eun-mi’s power converts the act of eating—specifically high-calorie breads and pastries—into a source of strength. Kim Hyang-gi brings a youthful, chaotic vitality to the role, but the subtext is poignant. Her character operates on a biological analog to Sang-woong’s financial mechanic: consumption as fuel. The trio—the broke civil servant, the drunk lawyer, and the gluttonous psychic—forms a tableau of modern dysfunction weaponized for justice. They are not the Avengers; they are a support group for people whose survival mechanisms have spiraled out of control.

The Aesthetics of Villainy: Inherited Power

Opposing this working-class coalition is the “Criminal Association” (or Beominhoe), a mysterious organization that hunts down superheroes. The leadership of this group, the siblings Jonathan and Joanna, represent the unchecked accumulation of capital and the arrogance of inherited power. Lee Chae-min, taking on his first major villainous role, plays Jonathan with a chilling vacuity. His “innocent face” masks a predatory nature, a hunter who views the struggles of the ordinary heroes with the detached amusement of a sociopath. His performance highlights a cynicism toward the “gold spoon” generation, suggesting that empathy is the first casualty of immense privilege.

Kang Han-na’s Joanna adds a layer of corporate menace. As a chaebol heiress and a leader within the criminal syndicate, she wields capital not as a fuel that burns away, but as a weapon that suppresses. The villains do not suffer the transactional limitations of the heroes; their resources appear infinite, highlighting the fundamental asymmetry of the class conflict. The “villain siblings” competing for succession within their criminal empire mirrors the dynastic struggles often depicted in Korean corporate dramas, effectively merging the superhero genre with the boardroom thriller. In Cashero, the true villain is not a monster from another dimension, but the monopoly of violence held by the ultra-rich.

Directorial Vision: The Texture of the Mundane

Director Lee Chang-min, whose previous works include the comedy Welcome to Waikiki and the corporate drama Agency, proves to be the ideal architect for this hybrid genre. Cashero sits precisely at the intersection of slapstick and social realism. Lee’s visual style avoids the sleek, sterile polish of many contemporary superhero productions in favor of a more textured, grounded aesthetic. The special effects are treated with a tactile grit; when money is consumed, it leaves behind debris, a physical reminder of the loss. The action choreography relies heavily on the physical limitations of the actors, emphasizing the exhaustion and the bruise, rather than the seamless grace of flight.

The director has stated his intention to create a “human-oriented hero story,” and this is evident in the camera’s focus. The lens lingers on the empty wallet, the cluttered desk, the worn-out shoes of the civil servant. These images reinforce the “everyday” nature of the supernatural. Lee manages the delicate tonal balance between the absurdity of the premise and the genuine pathos of financial ruin. When Sang-woong screams in frustration, the audience understands that his agony is twofold: the pain of the fight, and the pain of the expense.

Adaptation and the Expansion of the Source Material

Based on the webtoon by Team Befar, the series expands significantly on its source material to suit the serialized format of a Netflix drama. The original webtoon was praised for its minimalist style and its clever inversion of superhero tropes. The adaptation fleshes out the world, giving greater depth to the supporting characters and establishing a more structured antagonistic force in the form of the Criminal Association. The transition from the static panel to the moving image required a rethinking of how to visualize the “cash power.” The choice to show physical bills disintegrating is a masterstroke of adaptation, translating the abstract concept of “spending” into a visceral, irreversible action.

The series also navigates the narrative challenges of the webtoon’s ending, which some readers found abrupt or conceptually heavy. By structuring the drama around the rising tension with the Criminal Association, the showrunners have created a more traditional narrative arc while preserving the thematic core of the original work. The result is a story that feels both faithful to the spirit of the comic and robust enough to stand as a premium drama series.

The Heroism of Making Ends Meet

Cashero arrives at a moment when the global audience is intimately familiar with the fragility of financial stability. It rejects the escapism typical of the genre in favor of a “capitalist realism fantasy.” It does not offer a world where justice is free; it offers a world where the cost of doing good is deducted directly from your net worth. In Kang Sang-woong, we find a hero not for the ages, but for the pay period. He is the superhero as salaryman, fighting the crushing weight of the cost of living as much as he fights the villains.

The series stands as a significant evolution in the Korean superhero genre, moving beyond the historical and the metaphysical to tackle the economic. It suggests, with a wink and a grimace, that in 2025, the greatest superpower of all might simply be the ability to make ends meet while keeping one’s humanity intact.

Netflix

Discussion

There are 0 comments.

```