Art

How Brassaï Made the Modern City Visible After Dark

Lisbeth Thalberg

Nearly a century after they were taken, Brassaï’s photographs of Paris at night still shape how the modern city understands itself. Their renewed presentation matters now because they confront enduring questions about visibility and privacy in urban life. Long before constant lighting and digital images erased darkness, Brassaï showed night as a space where identities blur, social rules loosen, and the city reveals what daylight keeps in check.

An exhibition opening this winter at Howard Greenberg Gallery brings together two intertwined bodies of work: the images published in Brassaï’s landmark 1933 photobook Paris by Night, and a lesser-known group of photographs long withheld from public view, later titled The Secret Paris. Seen together, they reveal not only the breadth of Brassaï’s vision, but the social boundaries that once governed what could be shown.

When Paris by Night first appeared, it offered something unprecedented. Streets glistened with rain, lovers lingered in doorways, and cafés glowed against deep shadow. Paris emerged not as a monument-filled postcard, but as a living organism after dark. These images helped establish night photography as a serious artistic language, one capable of capturing mood, ambiguity, and modernity without relying on daylight clarity.

Yet alongside these now-canonical images were photographs considered unsuitable for publication at the time. Brassaï’s camera also entered brothels, clandestine bars, and intimate interiors where the city’s unofficial life unfolded. These photographs, suppressed for decades and published only in the mid-1970s, expose a parallel Paris shaped by secrecy and transgression. Their delayed appearance speaks as much about shifting moral climates as about the photographs themselves.

The exhibition, presented in collaboration with Grob Gallery of Geneva, allows these two visions to exist side by side. The effect is not sensational, but clarifying. Brassaï’s Paris was always double: poetic and abrasive, tender and indifferent. Streetlamps and mirrors, fog and stone walls, become tools for navigating a city where public spectacle and private vulnerability constantly overlap.

Brassaï arrived in Paris in the 1920s as a journalist, wandering the city at night after filing his daytime assignments. His method was slow and deliberate, shaped by long exposures and patient observation. Accompanied at times by the writer Henry Miller, he earned a reputation as an insider to the city’s hidden rhythms. The novelist famously called him “the eye of Paris,” a phrase that captured both his intimacy with the city and his role as witness.

His work did not emerge in isolation. Brassaï was deeply influenced by the Hungarian photographer André Kertész, whose lyrical approach to everyday scenes helped legitimize the street as a site of artistic inquiry. What Brassaï added was darkness itself—not as absence, but as substance. Night became a space where social hierarchies blurred and new forms of visibility took shape.

The renewed attention to Brassaï’s work coincides with a reissue of Paris by Night by Flammarion and a major museum presentation at Stockholm’s Moderna Museet. Together, these projects suggest a sustained interest in early twentieth-century photography as a lens on contemporary concerns: who controls images, whose lives are seen, and how cities remember themselves.

In revisiting Brassaï’s Paris, the exhibition does more than celebrate a master photographer. It reminds us that cities are archives of lived experience, layered with stories that surface only under certain conditions. Night, in Brassaï’s hands, was not merely a time of day, but a way of seeing history—partial, intimate, and unresolved.

Discussion

There are 0 comments.

```